Over the past several years AnandTech has grown to be much more than just a PC hardware review site. In fact, we consider ourselves to be just as much about the new mobile world as we do about the old PC world. We leveraged our understanding of component and system architecture in bringing a deeper, more analytical look to mobile silicon and devices. As we continued to invest in our mobile coverage and expertise, we found that readers, mobile component and device makers responded quite well to our approach.

AnandTech’s focus grew, but we quickly ran into a bottleneck when it came time to monetize that mobile content. Our mobile content did a great job of helping to grow the site (as well as bring new eyeballs to our traditional PC coverage as well). While we had no issues competing with larger corporate owned sites on the content front, when it came to advertising we were at a disadvantage. Our advantage in quality allowed us to make progress, but ultimately it became a numbers game. The larger corporate owned sites could show up with a network of traffic, substantially larger than what AnandTech could deliver, and land more lucrative advertising deals than we were able to. They could then in turn fund a larger editorial operation and the cycle continues.

AnandTech has been profitable since its inception; it’s been on a great growth curve these past couple of years and we’ve always been able to do more with less, but lately there’s been an increased investment in high quality content. It wasn’t that long ago where the only type of content seeing real investment was shallow, poorly researched and ultimately very cable-TV-news-like. More recently however we’ve seen a shift. Higher quality content is being valued and some big names (both on the publishing and VC fronts) have been investing in them. Honestly we haven’t seen a world like this in probably over a decade.

Before his departure, Anand spent almost a year meeting with all of the big names in the publishing space, both traditional and new media players. The goal was to find AnandTech a home with a partner that had a sustainable business model (similar to AnandTech’s), but could add the investment and existing reach to allow the site to better realize its potential. That search led to a number of interesting potential partners; it was a refreshing experience to say the least knowing that there are groups in the world who really value good content. Ultimately that search brought AnandTech to Purch.

Purch met the requirements: they have a sustainable business model, are profitable and have the sort of reach AnandTech needs to really hit the next level. More fundamentally however, Purch’s values are in line with AnandTech’s. In fact, it wasn’t that long ago that Purch acquired one of AnandTech’s biggest competitors in the late 1990s: Tom’s Hardware. Purch had already demonstrated a value for the sort of deep, long form content AnandTech was known for. In meeting with the Purch business and editorial teams, there was a clear interest in further developing AnandTech’s strengths as well as feeding back AnandTech’s learnings into the rest of the Purch family.

AnandTech and Tom’s Hardware remain editorially independent, and though no longer competitors, the goal is to learn from one another. To further invest in the areas that make us different, and together with the rest of the Purch family help to bring a higher standard of quality to the web.

The AnandTech team is staying in place and will continue to focus on existing coverage areas. We’re not changing our editorial policies or analytical approach and have no intentions of doing so. The one thing that will change is our ability to continue to grow the site. This if anything starts from the top; with a publisher to more directly handle the business of AnandTech, this frees me up to spend more time on content creation and helping the rest of our editors put together better articles. And in a hands-on business like journalism that benefit cannot be overstated.

AnandTech was an incredibly powerful force as an independent publisher, but it now joins a family whose combined traffic is eight times larger than what AnandTech was on its own. Our goal is to continue to invest in what we feel is the right approach to building high quality content; now we have an even greater ability to do just that.

Press Release
POST A COMMENT

345 Comments

View All Comments

  • FlyTexas - Friday, December 19, 2014 - link

    The new owners made a capital investment in the business, to get a better return on that investment, they will want to increase profits. That is just how it works...

    They may well see a need to invest further money to expand the content, and that is fine. It is also fine if they wish to offset that expense by having AnandTech test the AMD video cards and Tom's Hardware test the nVidia video cars (or the other way around) to save on testing hours and costs.

    Are you ok with that change? If I were in charge as a new owner, that is one of the first places that I'd find to cut and you'd have a heck of a time convincing me otherwise. I'd give you a chance, but in the process you'd have to address what else you *wouldn't* be able to afford without the change.
    Reply
  • JonnyDough - Sunday, December 28, 2014 - link

    He's passing it on to a group that will ruin it. We know this because we know what happened to other sites that were bought out by the same company. Good luck to you all. Reply
  • Samus - Saturday, December 20, 2014 - link

    I think Anand was getting tired of AT. And I understand.

    Anand and I are the same age and we've both been running our own businesses since high school. I'm growing tired of what I'm doing, but I value the relationships in my business too much to leave everyone hanging. But at some point, I'll realize what Anand did and know I need to look out for myself. Anand was lucky to leave AT in the hands of competent people. That's something I'm not even sure I'll be able to do.
    Reply
  • GreenThumb - Sunday, December 21, 2014 - link

    Agree with you Drumsticks. AnandTech continues to be awesome.

    And some people will always be snarky.
    Reply
  • Hiro_x2 - Sunday, December 21, 2014 - link

    Funny, Ive felt like Toms Hardware has gone into the crapper over the past few years.. Hopefully this site doesn't repeat Tom's history. Reply
  • The0ne - Wednesday, December 24, 2014 - link

    For me Anandtech has been on the decline ever since he started it in the early 90's. While they have become much, much more technical it has also become much more bias in some areas. The latter alone had me visiting the site less and less since Anand started the site. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    Then open your eyes. Reply
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    FWIW, I've been with AnandTech since about 2004, full-time since 2006. I have never had anyone suggest I give a favorable review to a part that wasn't good. If that changes, I value my integrity enough that I'd look for other employment. I've also known Ryan for pretty much that entire time, and he probably has more integrity than I do. The advertising has always been separate, and while there will almost certainly be some changes in content (e.g. to pick up news now that DT is gone), that shouldn't come with any changes in how we generate the content. Reply
  • blackbrrd - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link

    I think the staff here at Anandtech has always done a really good job. I stopped visiting tomshardware a long time ago when their quality fell. I do think that the above poster was afraid that people like you would leave the site due to the potential reasons you outlined. Reply
  • nathanddrews - Thursday, December 18, 2014 - link

    I was replying to:
    --------------------------------------------
    ws3 - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
    That remains to be seen.
    --------------------------------------------

    I took his comment to mean that he believes AT's integrity is already damaged or is in danger. Perhaps I misinterpreted his comment? My reply was a simple rebuttal to that notion. In that in the 15 years I've been reading AT, I've never seen evidence that AT is in any way compromised.

    Jarred, if you happen to read this in the landslide of comments, please understand that I hold AT in the highest regard and trust that you''ll do what's necessary to keep AT thorough, honest, and profitable (just as important).

    Trolls be trollin'.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now