As I opened my inbox this morning, I was surprised. I keep track of when Intel puts products on End of Life (or starts the process through something called Product Discontinuance), and so I usually see a run of 3-5 year old CPUs or storage or servers pass through without much of a worry. When I opened up my daily brief today however, the headline read ‘Core Processor with Hybrid Technology Discontinued’, which immediately struck me as a bit crazy.

Intel announced Lakefield, its only Hybrid CPU on the market, in January 2019. It pairs one of its big cores with four smaller Atom cores in a small 12mm square package. Not only this, Lakefield is one of Intel’s first Foveros packaging processors, with a 10nm compute piece of silicon sitting on top of an IO die, all packaged together with DRAM on top. The goal of the Lakefield design was to produce a processor with a super low idle power, but also have enough performance for hand-held devices. Intel quoted 1.2 mW when in idle, meeting that goal.

Lakefield came to market in June 2020 in two products: the Samsung Galaxy Book S 13.3-inch clamshell laptop, and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold, a foldable display-based design. Both of these products were premium priced, particularly the Fold with its display, however reported performance was more akin to a quad-core Atom notebook than the $2000 quad-core mobile devices they were aiming for. Battery life sounded good, although we have never tested it at AnandTech due to lack of access to review samples from Samsung, Lenovo, or Intel.

The key thing was the Hybrid CPU design. By pairing one of Intel’s big cores with four of its smaller Tremont Atom cores, the goal was to run the device almost exclusively on the Atom cores for efficiency and then call on the big core when anything latency related was required, such as when the user touches the screen or the keyboard. Within 16 milliseconds (or one frame at 60 Hz), the processor would switch over to the big core for the touch screen interaction, do what it needed to do (often in under 16 ms), and then power back down.

In principle, the concept is sound and makes a lot of sense, especially if the goal is to save battery. As Intel’s first Hybrid CPU design however, there were some initial teething issues as managing threads between the different performance levels required adjustments to Windows’ scheduler. Microsoft already has experience with this when dealing with Windows on Snapdragon devices using the Arm architecture, however it was a first for x86 and the first implementations were reportedly quite rough.

In reality, because of the price of the device, it was compared to hardware that had only big cores. Even if it was compared to Atom based notebooks in the $400 range, because the processor was a low powered device, often lower than the Atom notebooks it was being compared to, it didn’t fall favorably in those benchmarks either. The goal of Lakefield for Intel wasn’t performance, but experience and form factor innovation, which benchmarks never indicate.

The note today from Intel indicates that Lakefield is now on the path to End of Life. This means the following milestones:

  • Start of Product Discontinuance: July 6th 2021
  • Last Corporate Assurance: October 8th 2021
  • Last Product Discontinuance Order: October 22nd 2021
  • Orders are Non-Cancellable from October 22nd 2021
  • Last Shipment Date: April 29th 2022

The start of the process means announcing that they will stop manufacturing processors (July 6th) and if a company wants to put in an order, they have until October 22nd. However that’s also the date where orders can’t be canceled or returned, and all orders will be shipped by April 29th. That means that products could still come out with Lakefield after April 29th, however the OEM partners will not have any means to secure additional stock.

Intel has set its sights on its future Hybrid CPU designs, with the upcoming Alder Lake platform set to launch end of this year in either desktops or notebooks. There is also talk that Windows 11 is better suited to deal with Intel’s hybrid designs from a scheduler perspective. Overall, to see its only public Hybrid CPU suddenly go on product discontinuance after only a year in the market isn’t a great commitment to the technology from OEM partners. Intel's own Product Change Notification states that 'market demand for the products listed has shifted to other Intel products'.

Related Reading

 

POST A COMMENT

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jon Tseng - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    So basically Lakefield was a devkit for the Windows scheduler team... :-p Reply
  • Ian Cutress - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    That's a fun perspective :) Reply
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    It's how I've thought about it ever since the launch and subsequent limited buy-in. That, and a pipe cleaner for Foveros! Reply
  • Jon Tseng - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Ha I was thinking about it as a pipe cleaner for Alder Lake.. I guess we can characterise it as a pipe cleaner for whatever the Intel roadmap was smoking at the time! :-p Reply
  • Raqia - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    There's quite a few ambitious technologies in Lakefield but a big reason for Intel to have leaned into FOVEROS as early as it did was the lack of leading edge foundry capacity at 10nm or even 14nm had they continued to produce modems for Apple. I think they cut this part to free up 10nm foundry capacity for the ramp up of Alderlake parts, and we'll see whether these use FOVEROS (my guess is no.) Reply
  • niravvadodara - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Intel used Lakefield as a test chip to build a future roadmap (as per recent news article:https://www.anandtech.com/show/16653/intel-to-inve... They learned their lesson from it and they are improving themself against Apple/AMD/QualComm).
    Definitely Lakefield was first, so lot of issues where there.
    Reply
  • name99 - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Turns out Palm CEO was right about how mobile is hard -- just not about Apple!

    "We've learned and struggled for a few years here figuring out how to make a decent phone. PC guys are not going to just figure this out. They're not going to just walk in.” ...
    Reply
  • Blastdoor - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    I wonder if it's just hard to market one consumer product based on form factor and user experience when simultaneously marketing nearly all other consumer products based on price/performance.

    Maybe they should have emphasized how this design enabled more and brighter LEDs?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now